Unreferenced Formal Parameter Warning
I tested with Debug, and now with Release, in both configs the warning happens. What is the purpose of the box between the engines of an A-10? Puzzler - which spacecraft(s) (actually) incorporated wooden structural elements? So did code quality improve? http://digitalfishbowl.net/visual-studio/visual-studio-the-operation-could-not-be-completed-the-parameter-is-incorrect.html
Result of operator , () can't be compile-time constant. If there is a way to shut the warning down while increasing or at leastkeepingreadability, we would be glad to add it. The rest is considered on case by case. Top Log in to post comments Boris Dušek Fri, 11/21/2008 - 12:21 Quoting - Arch Robison (Intel) /W4 can't even check the paint right. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/26kb9fy0.aspx
Unreferenced Formal Parameter Warning
Sometimes, overcoming warnings in 3rd party headers is part of the pain. Hot Network Questions Movie about encountering blue alien Coding Standard - haphazard application Was user-agent identification used for some scripting attack techique? Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Why disable specific warning not working in Visual Studio up vote 5 down vote favorite With Visual Studio C++ 2013, I have If you don't want to include windows headers, the macro simply expands to a use of the parameter name in a do nothing expression: #define UNREFERENCED_PARAMETER(P) \ /*lint -save -e527 -e530
For example, let's consider C4512 above. This puts TBB on par with Boost which is where it should be. An attempt to use an assignment still leads to an error, as before - nothing changed except no warning. C4100 Suppress A question concerning Wolfram Alpha Integer function which takes every value infinitely often Subtracting empty set from another Will I encounter any problems as a recognizable Jew in India?
But it can be referenced -- in ASSERT. –harper Jun 11 '10 at 7:41 add a comment| up vote 4 down vote I would use a macro to suppress the unreferenced #pragma Warning(disable: 4100) How should I deal with players who prefer "realistic" approaches to challenges? The compiler (Visual C++ 2012) is generating a C4100 "Unreferenced Formal Parameter" warning...and this is annoying. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3020584/avoid-warning-unreferenced-formal-parameter Why am I getting warning C4100 when the variable is being used?
I am not in better position to influence MS than you are. Warning C4127 On the contrary, overcoming C4127 with the suggested workarounds would decrease code readability, and so decrease, not improve, the quality. Follow @ Méta Connexion Flux RSS des articles RSS des commentaires Site de WordPress-FR Trick of the Day : How to resolve «Unreferenced formal parameter» warning ? 1 6 Mar, 2011 How much more than my mortgage should I charge for rent?
#pragma Warning(disable: 4100)
Why does WordPress use outdated jQuery v1.12.4? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14203593/c4100-unreferenced-formal-parameter-when-used-in-a-template The issue is that TBB should not leak junk messages for usersto deal with. Unreferenced Formal Parameter Warning A shiney paint job does not mean the car is any good. /W4 is checking the paint. /W4 can't even check the paint right. C4189 As James McNellis said, you can silence the warning in C++ by removing the parameter name from the parameter list.
You'repassingyour***** on to the consumer of your code. weblink Works fine in any C++ code, though. Now a programmer explicitly coded operator= to be private, or derived the class from e.g. I guess this warning is meant for cases like "if (false)" or "if (2 + 1 < 4)", i.e. Unreferenced_parameter Gcc
The quality issue is with the compiler, not the library. c++ compiler-warnings suppress-warnings share|improve this question asked Jun 11 '10 at 6:19 bdhar 4,535114778 Use boost::ignore_unused(param) stackoverflow.com/a/24310846/888576 –Jean Davy Feb 3 at 17:37 add a comment| 6 Answers 6 Or how should I deal with this warning? navigate here Thank you.This is not a technical issue.
adding #include "tbb_stddef.h" and struct node : public internal::no_copy worked. C4512 I hope this makes sense to our users. Why does typography ruin the user experience?
defined(lint) #define UNREFERENCED_PARAMETER(P) (P) #define DBG_UNREFERENCED_PARAMETER(P) (P) #define DBG_UNREFERENCED_LOCAL_VARIABLE(V) (V) Tags: C, Cplusplus Saturday, March 12th, 20117:22 pmThis entry was posted on at and is filed under Windows.
I have a function that takes a parameter, then uses that parameter in a template. Quoting -Alexey Kukanov (Intel) For 4512, I think the right way toovercome is to derive the struct node from tbb::no_copy. disable M value and Z value by using arcpy Advisor professor asks for my dissertation research source-code Disproving Euler proposition by brute force in C Why does typography ruin the user Msdn C4127 To the users of TBB theye're totally meaningless and annoying.They could as well read "You're abig loser!" because there's nothing a TBB user can do with them apart from watching them
In my code, I just test MSVC 9, gcc 4.0.1 Apple and gcc 4.1 Linux, so I can imagine that for multiple versions of multiple compilers things are probably different. The warning level is set in the project properties (right-click project, select Properties; on the Configuration Properties -> C++ -> General, set "Warning Level"). It's not adeep philosophical question. his comment is here I'm afraid they won't much listen to a single voice.
Arithmetic or Geometric sequence? more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed The real functions are not candidates for inlining. –DigitalInBlue Jan 7 '13 at 20:42 He's repeating it anyway. –Puppy Jan 7 '13 at 20:42 @DeadMG: if that Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Visual Studio warning C4100 and TRACE up vote 1 down vote favorite In Visual Studio 2012, when I try to compile the
So from this: int someFunc(void* param1, void* param2); to: int someFunc(void* /*param1*/, void* /*param2*/); However, this won't work with C compilers below the C99 standard, I think. I would buy that argument if it were Intel's official view. Yes op_insert is constant; it's the bool template parameter, and it issobecause we want two different implementations to be instantiated from the same code; so dear compiler, instead of issuing a Puzzler - which spacecraft(s) (actually) incorporated wooden structural elements?
Top Log in to post comments uj Wed, 11/19/2008 - 15:09 Quoting - Arch Robison (Intel) We will see what we can do about the /W4 warnings. Using Visual Assist X it's no more than marking the name and pressing *. The one enabled by default simply expands to (P). Why is the size of my email about a third bigger than the size of its attached files?
Why does multiple inheritance increase sizeof of the object despite no virtual functions? c++ visual-studio share|improve this question asked Mar 25 '10 at 22:22 Jimmie 114129 add a comment| 3 Answers 3 active oldest votes up vote 17 down vote accepted If the parameters After looking more closely at it and looking at Microsoft's page about C4127, it's probably improper warning. Used car dealers are famous for putting making an internally damaged car shiney.